Legal Opinion

Zanders v. Anderson

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1996No. 95-68PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

Habeas corpus relief is available to redress a nonjurisdictional claim when there is no adequate remedy at law. As to adequate remedy, both appellant and appellee rely on In re Petition for Mallory (1985), 17 Ohio St.3d 34, 17 OBR 28, 476 N.E.2d 1045. In Mallory, the appellee had been convicted of two counts of receiving stolen property, but was placed on five years’ probation. During the. probation period, he was convicted of carrying a concealed weapon, and his probation was revoked. The concealed weapons violation was reversed on appeal. Then…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Hickman v. CapotsOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State ex rel. Jackson v. McFaulOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Flenoy v. Ohio Adult Parole AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Gordon Stanley v. Melody L. TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
  5. In re Writ of Habeas Corpus for MalloryOhio Supreme Court · 1985

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Duganitz v. Ohio Adult Parole AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State ex rel. Duganitz v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Barnett v. Ohio Adult Parole AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State ex rel. Cartwright v. Ohio Adult Parole Bd.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021
  5. State v. SutherlinOhio Court of Appeals · 2003

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API