Legal Opinion

Townsend. v. Cotten

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 25, 1937No. 27160PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCorn, J.

This is an action for damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained in an automobile accident. The plaintiff was riding as a guest in defendant’s car at the time the accident occurred. The cause was tried to the jury, resulting in a verdict for the defendant, and the court rendered judgment on the verdict, from which judgment the plaintiff appealed. The parties occupy the same position on appeal as in the trial court 'and will be referred to herein in the same order.

The plaintiff complains that the court erred in refusing to give plaintiff’s requested instruction No. 3, stating…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. St. Louis-S. F. R. Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  2. Poppy v. DugganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  3. Mudge Oil Co. v. SwansonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  4. Warner v. City of GuymonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  5. Farmers National Bank of Sulphur v. BellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Middlebrook v. Imler, Tenny & Kugler, M.D.'s, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  2. National Tank Co. v. ScottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  3. Ironside v. IronsideSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  4. Bowman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1946
  5. Wade Ex Rel. Wade v. ReimerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API