Park v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
TERRY, Associate Judge:
After a hearing at which petitioners were present, the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board denied their application for a Class B retailer’s license. 1 Petitioners contend that the Board’s action was not supported by substantial evidence, that the Board erred in denying their request to reopen the record, and that the hearing was incurably tainted when a Board member mentioned an ex parte conversation with the principal of a school located near petitioners’ store. We affirm.
I
Petitioners, Mr. and Mrs. Park, are the owners of the Corner Market, a “mom and pop” convenience…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- National Labor Relations Board v. Nevada Consolidated Copper Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Kopff v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- District of Columbia Department of Employment Services v. VilcheDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Panutat, LLC v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- Tiger WYK Ltd. v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- Udebiuwa v. District of Columbia Board of MedicineDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- Office of People's Counsel v. Public Service CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.