Legal Opinion

Hoffman v. Haasis

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 2, 1933No. Docket No. 7880Published

1Opinion of the CourtCraig, J.

In a suit praying return to the plaintiff of certain store fixtures, goods, wares and merchandise, or a judgment for moneys alleged to be due, after trial without a jury judgment was rendered in favor of the defendants, from which the plaintiff appealed.

The respondents Fulton Brothers entered into possession of premises of the plaintiff under the terms and provisions of a lease in writing by which it was agreed that they would “not let, sublet, sub-lease or assign this lease or the premises hereunder mentioned in whole or in part, or transfer, assign or sell the business, or assign or sell…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hassell v. BungeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Jarvis v. WebberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Elsom v. MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
  4. Bucher v. AllenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API