Legal Opinion

Kersey Manufacturing Co. v. Rozic

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 16, 1965No. Appeal, No. 282PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Wright, J.,

In an assumpsit action instituted by Kersey Manufacturing Company against Albert Rozic, in the Court of Common Pleas of Butler County, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the defendant. From an order of the court below refusing to grant a new trial, the plaintiff appealed to this court. The appeal was quashed as premature because no judgment had been entered. See Kersey Manufacturing Company v. Rozic, 205 Pa. Superior Ct. 551, 211 A. 2d 76. Judgment was thereafter entered on the verdict, and this appeal followed.

It is appellant’s contention that a new trial should be…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Consolidated Tile & Slate Co. v. FoxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Dora v. DoraSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  3. Allegro v. Rural Valley Mut. Fire Ins.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  4. Sebastianelli v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  5. Department of Labor & Industry v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kersey Manufacturing Co. v. RozicSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  2. AnimalScan, LLC v. Live Oak Veterinary Specialists, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
  3. Fischer v. Borsher, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Monroe County1972
  4. Kersey Manufacturing Co. v. RozicSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API