Legal Opinion
Protect Our Water v. Flowers
District Court, E.D. California
Decided March 22, 2004No. CIV.S-03-0986 WBS/JFMPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SHUBB, District Judge.
Plaintiffs brought this action pursuant to the Clean Water Act (“CWA”), 33 UJ3.C. §§ 1251 et seq.; the Endangered Species Act (“ESA”), 16 U.S.C. §§ 1531 et seq.; the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 4321 et seq.; and the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), 5 U.S.C. §§ 701 et seq. to challenge the issuance by defendant U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (“Corps”) to defendant Diablo Grande Limited Partnership (“Diablo Grande”) of a permit 'for the dredge and fill of waters of the United States. Plaintiffs now move for a preliminary…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Center for Biological Diversity v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife ServiceDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
- Center for Biological Diversity v. United States Forest ServiceDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2024