Legal Opinion

Center for Biological Diversity v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

District Court, E.D. California

Decided July 17, 2025No. 2:21-cv-01527Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL No. 2:21-cv-01527-DJC-DMC DIVERSITY, et al, 12 Plaintiff, 13 ORDER v. 14 UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE 15 SERVICE, et al, 16 Defendant. 17 18 This case concerns the federal government’s permitting of the proposed 19 Stonegate Development Project in Chico, California. Plaintiffs allege that the project — 20 a proposed 314-acre multi-use development with 423 single-family residential lots, 21 13.4 acres of multi-family residential land uses, 36.6 acres of commercial land uses, 22 5.4…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Save the Yaak Committee, Donn Vance v. J.R. Block, Secretary of Agriculture R. Max Peterson, Chief, Forest Service Thomas Costin, Region I ForesterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  3. Utahns for Better Transportation v. United States Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
  4. National Wildlife Federation v. National Marine Fisheries ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. Friends of the Clearwater v. DombeckCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API