Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Andrew Ansaldi Co. v. Planning & Zoning Commission

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 12, 1988No. 13202Published

1Concurrence

Shea, J., with whom Covello, J.,

joins, concurring. In Simko v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 205 Conn. 413, 533 A.2d 879 (1987) (Simko I), and Simko v. Zoning *71Board of Appeals, 206 Conn. 374, 538 A.2d 202 (1988) (Simko II), a majority of this court held that the change from “or” to “and” effectuated by the 1985 amendment to General Statutes § 8-8 (b), making service upon the town clerk as well as the chairman or clerk of a zoning board of appeals mandatory, was intended, despite the paucity of any textual foundation or supporting legislative history, to make the clerk of the municipality a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Monroe v. MonroeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  2. Simko v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  3. Simko v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  4. Tomko v. VissersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  5. Village Creek Homeowners Assn. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API