Legal Opinion

W. B. Coppersmith & Sons, Inc. v. Ætna Insurance

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 23, 1942PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchenck, J.

Since the policy in suit contained an unlimited one thousand dollar deductible clause, and since the loss in suit was only $890.00, it follows, nothing else appearing, that the action cannot be maintained.

However, the plaintiffs by an amendment to the original complaint seek to reform the policy to conform to what they allege was the policy actually purchased by the plaintiffs by striking therefrom the clause providing for $1,000 deductible in so far as it related to loss by fire, which said clause they allege was inserted in said policy (1) through mistake or inadvertence of the draftsman or…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Upton v. TribilcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Clements v. Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  3. Ricks v. . BrooksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. BW Acceptance Corporation v. SpencerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  2. Setzer v. OLD REPUBLIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  3. Hice v. Hi-Mil, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  4. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. Nello L. Teer Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  5. Stanley v. CoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API