Legal Opinion

Myrtle Apartments, Inc. v. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 31, 1962No. 252PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.

In testing the sufficiency of a complaint, the court ignores the conclusions and looks to the facts. Here, the plaintiff alleged: “The boiler was in all respects sound and in proper working condition”; and that the defendant, through its engineer, represented that, “The general condition of the boiler is poor. It is, therefore, recommended that this boiler be replaced with a new or better one of standard construction as soon as this heating season is over.”

With respect to the further representations in the letter, the plaintiff alleged: “And as to the remaining representations and contents of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Vail v. VailSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  2. Ward v. . HealthSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  3. Ward v. HeathSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  4. Shives v. SampleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  5. Davis v. RhodesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Phoenix Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Myers & Chapman v. Thomas G. EvansSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  3. Wells Fargo Ins. Servs. United States, Inc. v. LinkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2019
  4. Stanford v. OwensCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  5. Leftwich v. GainesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API