Legal Opinion

Wolff v. Jordan Marsh Co.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided January 29, 1935No. 3897PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BREWSTER, District Judge.

This is an infringement suit, brought by the patentee and a licensee, alleging infringement of letters patent of the United States relating to gentlemen’s and children’s underwear. The defenses are anticipation, noninvention, and noninfringement.

Statement of Facts.

1. On Wolff’s application, dated March 6, 1929, letters patent of the United States No. 1,787,098 issued December 30, 1930. The invention covered an improvement in undergarments for men, known as “union suits.” The object of the invention was to add to the comfort and convenience of the wearer at all times.

2.…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. Topliff v. TopliffSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  5. Smith v. Goodyear Dental Vulcanite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1877

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Freeman v. Premier Mach. Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1935
  2. Six-Way Corp. v. McCurdy & Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1935
  3. Wolff v. Stewart & Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API