Legal Opinion
Wolff v. Stewart & Co.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided November 3, 1937No. 2477PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
CPIESNUT, District Judge.
The patent here in suit has recently been held invalid for want of invention in view of the prior art by the Circuit Court of Appeals for the First Circuit in Jordan Marsh Co. v. Wolff, 80 F.(2d) 314, reversing a decree of the District Court reported in 9 F.Supp. 516, which held, the patent valid and infringed. It is, however," contended for the plaintiffs here that the present case presents another and different *136record and requires independent judgment, and this position seems to be clearly correct. The defendants in the two cases are different. Although the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Atlantic Works v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Mast, Foos & Co. v. Stover Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Smith v. Goodyear Dental Vulcanite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Triplett v. LowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Goodyear Dental Vulcanite Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. Standard Oil Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1948