Legal Opinion

Cooley v. Quick Supply Company

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided September 18, 1974No. 2-56030PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LeGRAND, Justice.

This appeal had its origin in an accident which inflicted serious personal injuries to plaintiff when several sticks of dynamite he was holding exploded. Claiming a defect in the fuse used to ignite the dynamite, plaintiff seeks recovery from Quick Supply Company, wholesale distributor which supplied the fuse to the retailer from whom plaintiff ultimately bought it. A jury trial resulted in a verdict and judgment for plaintiff, which we affirm.

Plaintiff asserted a right of recovery based, first, on the doctrine of strict liability and, in a separate count, he asked damages…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. Carroll Towing Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
  2. Hall v. EI Du Pont De Nemours & Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1972
  3. Rosenau Ex Rel. Rosenau v. City of EsthervilleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
  4. Canifax v. Hercules Powder Co.California Court of Appeal · 1965
  5. Hawkeye-Security Insurance Co. v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1970

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Olson v. Prosoco, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1994
  2. Smith v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  3. Simonetta v. Viad Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Rowen v. LeMars Mutual Insurance Co. of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
  5. Henkel v. R AND BOTTLING CO.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1982

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API