Legal Opinion

Norris v. Campbell

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1902No. 3843PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Thurston County. — Hon. •Oliver Y. Linn, Judge.

1Per curiam

This is an action to recover the possession of real property under the statute of forcible entry and detainer. To the' complaint of the respondents the appellants answered, putting in issue certain of its allegations and pleading affirmative matter in defense. The respondents moved to malee the answer more definite and certain, which motion the court granted after notice and *655hearing, bio amended answer was filed within the time fixed by the court, whereupon the respondents moved for default. This motion was also granted, after notice and hearing, and the court afterwards, on respondents’…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mendenhall v. KratzWashington Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Pedersen v. KlinkertWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Tacoma Recycling, Inc. v. Capitol Material Handling Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1983
  3. Paine-Gallucci, Inc. v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  4. General Lithographing & Printing Co. v. American Trust Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Hyde v. HeatonWashington Supreme Court · 1906

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API