Legal Opinion

Schwartz v. Sar Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 14, 1959PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by the negligent operation of a motor vehicle, the appeal is from an order (1) granting respondent’s motion for summary judgment striking out the answer (Rules Civ. Prae., rule 113), and (2) denying appellants’ motion for permission to serve an amended answer. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, respondent’s motion for summary judgment denied, and appellants’ motion for permission to serve an amended answer granted. The amended answer is to be served, if appellants be so advised, within 10 days…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Schwartz v. Sar Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1959

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Richard Walker, Dorothy WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1967
  2. Graci v. DenaroNew York Supreme Court · 1979
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Richard Walker, Dorothy WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API