Legal Opinion
Brazzle v. Washington City
District Court, D. Utah
Decided September 30, 2013No. Case No. 2:09-cv-00074-EJFPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
EVELYN J. FURSE, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Defendant Washington City moved the Court for Summary Judgment on Plaintiff Andre Brazzle’s remaining claims for relief, specifically, Mr. Brazzle’s claims of Hostile Work Environment in violation of both Title VII and 42 U.S.C. section 1981.1 The Court has carefully reviewed the original submissions of the parties and determined it does not need oral argument on this motion. D.U.Civ. R. 7-l(f).
Washington City contends no…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Handy v. WS Barricade CorporationDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2025