Legal Opinion

Datz v. Keller

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 28, 1964PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Interlocutory and final decrees affirmed. The plaintiff appeals from an interlocutory decree sustaining defendants’ demurrer to his amended substitute bill of complaint and from a final decree dismissing his bill. The minority stockholder’s bill seeks a declaratory judgment under G. L. e. 231A. The allegations in part are that the defendants Keller, the officers and directors of the corporation, have conspired to conduct the corporate affairs for their own benefit, have misappropriated corporate funds, have paid themselves excessive fees for services rendered, have refused to call annual…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bartlett v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
  2. S. Solomont & Sons Trust, Inc. v. New England Theatres Operating Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Houle v. LowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  2. Brick v. Dominion Mortgage & Realty TrustDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1977
  3. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,517 Walter Untermeyer, Jr. v. Fidelity Daily Income TrustCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
  4. Aliberti v. GreenMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1978
  5. Harhen v. BrownMassachusetts Superior Court · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API