Legal Opinion
Brick v. Dominion Mortgage & Realty Trust
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided November 29, 1977No. Civ. 76-605PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM and ORDER
ELFVIN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs have filed a four-count 1 complaint. The First Count alleges violations of sections 11 and 12(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, 15 U.S.C. §§ 77k and 777 (2) and of section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78j and of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rule 10b-5, 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5, promulgated thereunder. The Second Count sets forth claims under these same sections against Marine Midland Bank, Inc. —Western (“Marine”) individually and as agent for certain other lender banks under an aiding and…
2Cases cited87 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Aldrich v. McCulloch Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,722 Securities and Exchange Commission v. The Seaboard Corporation, Etc., Admiralty Fund and Admiralty Fund Growth Series Litigation Trust, Cross-Claimant/appellant v. Hugh Johnson & Company, Inc., Hugh Johnson, Norman Michael Keiser, and Ernst& Ernst, Cross-Defendants/appelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Zola v. GordonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- In re Consumers Power Co. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1985
- In re Itel Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1981
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.