Legal Opinion

Harhen v. Brown

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided August 18, 1997No. 971522HPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

van Gestel, J.

This matter comes before the Court on motions to dismiss filed by all of the defendants. The case is a member’s derivative action brought pursuant to Mass.R.Civ.P. Rule 23.1 by a policyholder, Loretta M. Harhen (“Harhen”), of the John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company (“Hancock”).

BACKGROUND

Hancock is a Massachusetts mutual insurance company and Harhen, at all times material, has been a policyholder. In April of 1996 the plaintiff made a member’s demand on the board of directors of Hancock, seeking certain action relating to the activities of the company’s in-house lobbyist.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Shaw v. Digital Equipment Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  3. Nader v. CitronMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  4. Cooper v. PateSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Rush PETTWAY Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. AMERICAN CAST IRON PIPE COMPANY, a Corporation, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Demoulas ex rel. Demoulas Super Markets, Inc. v. Demoulas Super Markets, Inc.Massachusetts Superior Court · 2003
  2. Gardner v. Applied Geographics, Inc.Massachusetts Superior Court · 2004
  3. In re Polymedica Corp. Shareholder Derivative LitigationMassachusetts Superior Court · 2002
  4. Shaev v. AlvordMassachusetts Superior Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API