Minar Rodelius Co. v. Lysen

Julius J. Olson, Justice.

Plaintiff’s action in replevin for the possession of an Oldsmobile coupé was resolved against it by a jury. Its motion for new trial was denied, and the appeal is from that order.

The only claim upon which reversal is based is that the “court erred in permitting the defendant to testify, over objection, that the written contract was not final, and that he had a period of time within which he could cancel the deal if he desired.”

The record permits the triers of fact to have found that on April 1, 1937, two of plaintiff’s salesmen called on defendant at Benson. Plaintiff…