Conopco, Inc. v. Roll International and Paramount Farms, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Judge DORSEY dissents in a separate opinion.
BACKGROUND
McLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judge:
This civil procedure morass arises from the sale by Conopeo, Inc. d/b/a Lipton (“Conopeo”) of its Sunkist brand fruit roll snack business to Roll International Corporation (“Roll”) and Roll’s wholly-owned subsidiary-Paramount Farms, Inc. (“Paramount”). Under a purchase agreement signed in June 1995 (the “Purchase Agreement”), Conopeo agreed to transfer its existing fruit roll inventory (the “Inventory”) to Roll at a closing date one month later. When the Purchase Agreement was signed, the book value of the…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Collins v. City of Harker HeightsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by251 opinions
- Staehr v. Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Chuan Wang v. PalmisanoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Patrowicz v. Transamerica HomeFirst, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2005
- R. Parungao v. Community Health Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
- Farid v. BoueyDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2008
246 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.