Legal Opinion

Conopco, Inc. v. Roll International and Paramount Farms, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 3, 2000No. 1999PublishedCited by 251 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judge DORSEY dissents in a separate opinion.

BACKGROUND

McLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judge:

This civil procedure morass arises from the sale by Conopeo, Inc. d/b/a Lipton (“Conopeo”) of its Sunkist brand fruit roll snack business to Roll International Corporation (“Roll”) and Roll’s wholly-owned subsidiary-Paramount Farms, Inc. (“Paramount”). Under a purchase agreement signed in June 1995 (the “Purchase Agreement”), Conopeo agreed to transfer its existing fruit roll inventory (the “Inventory”) to Roll at a closing date one month later. When the Purchase Agreement was signed, the book value of the…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Collins v. City of Harker HeightsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by251 opinions

  1. Staehr v. Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  2. Chuan Wang v. PalmisanoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
  3. Patrowicz v. Transamerica HomeFirst, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2005
  4. R. Parungao v. Community Health Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
  5. Farid v. BoueyDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2008

246 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API