Legal Opinion

Volesky v. North Dakota Game & Fish Department

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 1997No. Civil 960374PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEUMANN, Justice.

[¶ 1] Dominic Volesky appealed from a judgment affirming a State Personnel Board decision adopting a hearing officer’s recommendation that the Game and Fish Department properly eliminated Volesky’s job through a reduction in force (RIF). We hold Game and Fish’s elimination of Volesky’s job complied with the law for a RIF and the Board’s decision that Game and Fish’s action was not a reprisal is supported by a preponderance of the evidence. We affirm.

[¶2] Volesky was a classified, nonproba-tionary employee at Game and Fish, holding the position of Pilot II. Volesky initially…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hubbard v. United Press International, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  2. Richard Couty v. Elizabeth Dole, Secretary, United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
  3. Ann C. Schweiss, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Chrysler Motors Corporation, Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
  4. Wagner v. Sheridan County Social Services BoardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Domek v. North Dakota State Personnel BoardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Miller v. Civil Service Commission of the Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson CountyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2008
  2. Geffre v. North Dakota Department of HealthNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Myers-Weigel Funeral Home v. Job Insurance Division of Job Service North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Miller v. CIVIL SERVICE COM'NCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2008
  5. State v. SauerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API