Volesky v. North Dakota Game & Fish Department
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
NEUMANN, Justice.
[¶ 1] Dominic Volesky appealed from a judgment affirming a State Personnel Board decision adopting a hearing officer’s recommendation that the Game and Fish Department properly eliminated Volesky’s job through a reduction in force (RIF). We hold Game and Fish’s elimination of Volesky’s job complied with the law for a RIF and the Board’s decision that Game and Fish’s action was not a reprisal is supported by a preponderance of the evidence. We affirm.
[¶2] Volesky was a classified, nonproba-tionary employee at Game and Fish, holding the position of Pilot II. Volesky initially…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hubbard v. United Press International, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Richard Couty v. Elizabeth Dole, Secretary, United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
- Ann C. Schweiss, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Chrysler Motors Corporation, Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- Wagner v. Sheridan County Social Services BoardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Domek v. North Dakota State Personnel BoardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Miller v. Civil Service Commission of the Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson CountyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2008
- Geffre v. North Dakota Department of HealthNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Myers-Weigel Funeral Home v. Job Insurance Division of Job Service North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Miller v. CIVIL SERVICE COM'NCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2008
- State v. SauerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011