Grossman Furniture Co. v. Pierre
United States District Court
1Opinion of the Court
Yanoff, P. J. D. C.
This is a test case in -which defendant questions the constitutionality of the New Jersey Replevin Act, N. J. S. A. 2A:59-1, on the ground that it permits the taking of property by force without a preliminary trial-type hearing, alleging that it thereby violates the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution. No claim is made of unconstitutionality under the New Jersey Constitution.
The factual context in which the issue is raised is that plaintiff sold defendant and her husband household furniture, including a bedroom set, a refrigerator and other…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Blair v. PitchessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Whyy, Inc. v. Borough of GlassboroSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Laprease v. Raymours Furniture CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1970
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Grossman Furniture Co. v. PierreNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972