Legal Opinion
Miller v. One 2001 Pontiac Aztek
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided October 16, 2003No. C8-02-613PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GILBERT, Justice.
The facts in this case are undisputed. On June 6, 2001, in the City of Blooming-ton, Debra Jane Miller, appellant, was arrested for gross misdemeanor driving while impaired (DWI) pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 169A.20, subd. 1(5) (2000). Approximately 7 months earlier, on November 16, 2000, appellant was arrested for gross misdemeanor DWI, having a blood-alcohol content (BAC) of .26. On January 25, 2001, appellant was convicted of the first offense and, on July 11, 2001, appellant was convicted of the second DWI offense.
Appellant’s second DWI conviction qualified as a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. BajakajianSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- State Farm Insurance Companies v. SeefeldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Lavera Granetha Ashanti v. City of Golden ValleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- Laase v. County of IsantiCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- Minnesota Voters Alliance v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- State v. O'MalleyOhio Supreme Court · 2022
- Carlisle ex rel. State v. Ten Thousand Four Hundred Forty-Seven Dollars in United States Currency ($10,447.00)Hawaii Supreme Court · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.