Legal Opinion

Sealink, Inc. v. Frenkel & Co.

District Court, D. Puerto Rico

Decided July 31, 2006No. Civil 04-1709 (DRD)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

DOMÍNGUEZ, District Judge.

Plaintiff Sealink, Inc. (hereinafter “Seal-ink”) filed the instant complaint pursuant to this Court’s jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. sec. 1332. See Docket Nos. 1 & 3. Sealink requests damages for the denial of coverage and the voidance of an insurance policy placed by the defendant and lost business opportunities. Id., at ¶¶ 21-24. Defendant Frenkel & Co., Inc. (hereinafter “Frenkel”), filed a motion for summary judgment alleging three main issues. See Docket No. 19. First, Frenkel contends that Sealink’s action was time barred by the statute of…

2Cases cited39 opinions

Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
Mathews v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

Lopez v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2020