Legal Opinion
Ashland Oil, Inc., Cross-Appellant v. Phillips Petroleum Company v. United States of America, Intervenor-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided May 10, 1977No. 73-1797, 73-1798 and 73-1799PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SETH, Circuit Judge.
This action was brought to recover the reasonable value of helium intermixed with natural gas, extracted therefrom, and sold by the defendant Phillips to the United States. The plaintiff prevailed against the defendant and the Government as intervenor in the lower court, and they both appeal. Plaintiff also appeals, but only as to the ultimate division of the proceeds derived from the helium as ordered by the trial court.
The case was commenced in the Southern District of Texas, but transferred at defendant’s request to the Northern District of Oklahoma. The complaint…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Clearfield Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Farm Credit Bank of WichitaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Oliver S. Brown v. Phillips Petroleum Company, Etc., Mobil Oil Corporation, Ashland Oil, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Marathon Oil Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Gila River Indian Community v. Henningson, Durham & Richardson, a Nebraska Corporation, and Ranier Construction Company, Inc., an Arizona CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. David E. Van DivinerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.