Legal Opinion
United States v. David E. Van Diviner
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 7, 1987No. 86-2224PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOGAN, Circuit Judge.
After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R. App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 34.1.8(c) and 27.1.-2. The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Defendant David E. Van Diviner appeals from a judgment holding him personally liable in damages for breach of a custodial maintenance contract between a corporation he owned and the United States. The United States sued the corporation, Trail Bronc, Inc., and…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- United States v. Kimbell Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Clearfield Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Moline Properties, Inc. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Hardin v. Manitowoc-Forsythe Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
- Bangor Punta Operations, Inc. v. Bangor & Aroostook RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Intergen N v. v. GrinaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- Mobil Oil Corporation v. Linear Films, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1989
- National Labor Relations Board v. Greater Kansas City Roofing the New Greater Kansas City Roofing, Inc. Maude Clementine ClarkeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Pizza Management, Inc. v. Pizza Hut, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1990
- Bombardier Capital, Inc. v. Tinkler (In Re Tinkler)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 2004
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.