Legal Opinion
United States v. Ortiz-Lazaro
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 16, 2018No. 16-2141PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge.
Defendant Ortiz-Lazaro pled guilty to illegal reentry after deportation in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1326 (a)(1) and (b)(1), and he admitted that he violated the supervised release terms of his prior illegal reentry charge. He appeals his above-guidelines sentence for the supervised release violation as procedurally and substantively unreasonable. We affirm.
I
On September 4, 2015, Mr. Ortiz-Lazaro pled guilty to one count of reentry of a deported alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (a). He was sentenced to eight months in prison and three years of supervised release,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. SmartCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. McCombCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. GriffithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. CarterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. BellamyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.