United States v. Klock
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FRANK, Circuit Judge.
Klock, employed by the bank in its bookkeeping department, had charge of “Ledger 65” which contained a large number of commercial accounts. At the trial, Klock unequivocally testified, both on direct and cross-examination, that in this ledger, in 1950, he made two false entries in order to conceal from bank examiners an inbalance due to the allowance of large overdrafts by certain of the bank’s depositors.
He also testified, by way of defense, that he had been authorized by his superiors to allow such overdrafts and to fail to post them as overdrafts in the bank’s books.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Horning v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Cochran & Sayre v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- United States v. RemingtonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- United States v. TramaglinoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- United States v. AlperCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. Donald SteffenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. John R. Adamson, IIICourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Joel Carruth StokesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Richard Jaynes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- United States v. Van DykeDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.