Legal Opinion
Richard Jaynes v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 29, 1955No. 14247PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DENMAN, Chief Judge.
Jaynes appeals from the conviction on five counts of an indictment, all the sentences being concurrent. In this situation if the sentence on any one count is valid, there should be an affirmance.
Count four of the indictment charged:
“That on or about the third day of July, 1953, at Ketchikan, Division Number One, Territory of Alaska, Richard Jaynes, being then and there the Cashier of the First National Bank of Ketchikan, a bank insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, did wilfully unlawfully and feloniously make a false entry in a book of the said bank, to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States v. KlockCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
- United States v. KlockCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ples Elworth Russell, and Roy Russell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
- Richard Jaynes and Veda J. Jaynes v. The First National Bank of Ketchikan, Alaska, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1956
- Jack A. Lemon and Martin De Bruin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- Jack A. Lemon and Martin De Bruin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- Wallace Higa, Administrator of the Estate of Takeichi Higa, Deceased v. Transocean Airlines, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.