Bell v. Howes
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Arthur Bell, a Michigan prisoner proceeding pro se, appeals the district court’s judgment denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Bell has also filed numerous motions for miscellaneous relief.
I
The facts of this case are fully reported in our previous decision in Bell v. Howes, 703 F.3d 848, 849-50 (6th Cir. 2012) (Bell I), and are only briefly recounted here. On September 22, 1988, Priscilla Matthews and William “Herk” Thompson were in a Detroit motel room when the motel room door was kicked open. Two men entered, abducted Thompson, and drove…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bell v. HowesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020
- Blocker v. GrahamDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2022
- Davis v. HortonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020
- Demario T. Simpson v. Paul SchreiberDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2026
- Green v. DavisDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2023
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.