Legal Opinion
In Re Doe 2
Texas Supreme Court
Decided March 7, 2000No. 00-0191PublishedCited by 93 opinions
1Opinion of the Court 1
*280OPINION
2Opinion of the Court · EnochJustice Enoch
in which Chief Justice PHILLIPS, Justice BAKER, Justice HANKINSON, Justice O’NEILL, and Justice GONZALES joined, and in which Justice OWEN joined in Part VII.
I
The court of appeals affirmed the trial court’s denial of a minor’s request for waiver of parental notification to obtain an abortion. We vacate the judgments of the court of appeals and the trial court and remand to the trial court for proceedings consistent with this opinion.
II
Jane Doe is a pregnant, unemancipated minor. Under Family Code section 33.003, Doe applied to the trial court for an order allowing her to have an…
3Cases cited26 opinions
- Holley v. AdamsTexas Supreme Court · 1976
- Catalina v. BlasdelTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. DanforthSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Worford v. StamperTexas Supreme Court · 1991
- Sax v. VottelerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by93 opinions
- Crosstex North Texas Pipeline, L.P., N/K/A Enlink North Texas Pipeline, Lp v. Andrew Gardiner and Shannon GardinerTexas Supreme Court · 2016
- the Better Business Bureau of Metropolitan Houston, Inc. v. John Moore Services, Inc. and John Moore Renovation, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2013
- in the Interest of D.W., T.W., and S.G., Children, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2008
- In the Interest of T.D.C.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2002
- In the Interest of D.R.L.M.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2002
88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.