Legal Opinion
Franklin Sugar Refining Co. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided January 4, 1906No. 18PublishedCited by 1 opinion
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
1Opinion of the Court
GRAY, Circuit Judge.
The facts of this case are not in controversy, as the sole disputed question relates to the proper construction of section 5 of the Act of July 24, 1897 (30 Stat. 205, c. 11 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1693]), in its application to the admitted state of facts. The language of said section is as follows:
“Sec. 5. That whenever any country, dependency, or colony shall pay or bestow, directly or indirectly, any bounty or grant upon the exportation of any article or merchandise from such country, dependency, or colony, and such article or merchandise is dutiable under the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Marriott v. BruneSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
- Lawder v. StoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Harrison v. VoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
- The United States, in Error v. Horace Southmayd and Stephen C. SouthmaydSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
- American Sugar Refining Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hammond Lead Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969