Legal Opinion

Hammond Lead Products, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided November 7, 1969No. C.D. 3915; Protest 67/77548-5928PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MALETZ, Judge:

The single question in this case— which comes before the court on an American manufacturer’s protest — is whether the Mexican Government, directly or indirectly, bestows a bounty or grant, within the meaning of section 303 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. § 1303), upon the manufacture, production or exportation of a lead oxide known as litharge. Section 303 provides:

Whenever any country, dependency, colony, province, or other political subdivision of government, person, partnership, association, cartel, or corporation shall pay or bestow, directly or indirectly, any bounty…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. G. S. Nicholas & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. Downs v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  3. Downs v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1902
  4. United States v. Hills Bros.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1901
  5. Hammond Lead Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. SCM Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1978
  2. Bradlow, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
  3. American Express Company v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
  4. Zenith Radio Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1977
  5. Zenith Radio Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API