Hammond Lead Products, Inc. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
MALETZ, Judge:
The single question in this case— which comes before the court on an American manufacturer’s protest — is whether the Mexican Government, directly or indirectly, bestows a bounty or grant, within the meaning of section 303 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. § 1303), upon the manufacture, production or exportation of a lead oxide known as litharge. Section 303 provides:
Whenever any country, dependency, colony, province, or other political subdivision of government, person, partnership, association, cartel, or corporation shall pay or bestow, directly or indirectly, any bounty…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- G. S. Nicholas & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Downs v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Downs v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1902
- United States v. Hills Bros.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1901
- Hammond Lead Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- SCM Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1978
- Bradlow, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
- American Express Company v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1977
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1977