Legal Opinion
Marshall v. Proctor & Gamble Manufacturing Co.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided February 17, 1959No. Civ. A. 9207PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
R. DORSEY WATKINS, District Judge.
Plaintiff’s complaint contains three causes of action. The first is for infringement of United States Patent 2,-724,702 issued November 22, 1955; the second for breach of confidential relationship ; and the third for “False Marking and Misrepresentation in Violation of Title 15 U.S.C.[A.] section 1125a” [Lan-ham Act].
Defendants answered the causes of action and counterclaimed for declarations of invalidity; noninfringement; and nonviolations of confidential relationship or of the Lanham Act. Thereafter defendants moved that the third cause of action be…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- L'Aiglon Apparel, Inc. v. Lana Lobell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
- Productive Inventions, Inc., a Corporation v. Trico Products Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- Central Coal & Coke Co. v. HartmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
- American Washboard Co. v. Saginaw Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1900
- Samson Crane Co. v. Union Nat. Sales, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1949
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Colligan v. Activities Club of New York, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
- Booth v. Colgate-Palmolive CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973
- State of Florida Ex Rel. Broward County v. Eli Lilly & Co.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1971
- Marshall v. Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1962
- Jo Ann Colligan v. Activities Club Of New York, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971