Legal Opinion

Chesbrough Lumber Co. v. Chippewa Circuit Judge

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1916No. Calendar No. 27,002PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Mandamus by the Chesbrough Lumber Company, a corporation, against Patrick H. O’Brien, circuit judge of the twelfth judicial circuit, presiding in Chippewa circuit, to compel respondent to vacate an order of relaxation of costs entered in a suit in which relator was •defendant.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

This mandamus proceeding is brought by the relator against Patrick H. O’Brien, circuit Judge, to vacate an order entered in the case of E. F. Perry & Co. v. Chesbrough Lumber Co., retaxing relator’s costs therein, and requiring him to tax the costs of relator as taxed by the clérk of said court, or to dismiss the appeal taken from the taxation thereof by said clerk. Questions are raised about the regularity of the appeal from the taxation of the clerk; but, as the case is fully argued, we will dispose of it upon the merits. There were three cases in the circuit court: Packard v. Lumber Co.,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jeffery v. HurshMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  2. McHugh v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Vernon, Greensburgh & Rushville Railroad v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. L. E. Waterman Co. v. LockwoodU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1904

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Chesbrough Lumber Co. v. Chippewa Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API