Legal Opinion

Vernon, Greensburgh & Rushville Railroad v. Johnson

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1886No. 11,749PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From the Scott Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHowk, C. J.

In this ease the error assigned by appellants, *127upon the overruling of their motion to re-tax certain costs - adjudged against them herein, presents the only questions we are required to consider and decide.

The motion was duly verified, and therein it was stated that, after the trial of this cause, and after the adjournment of the court, at the term thereof last preceding the filing of such motion, the clerk of such court, through a misapprehension of the facts and the law, taxed and allowed as part of the costs of this suit certain illegal and constructive mileage; fees to certain named…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ridge v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Joyce v. RussellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Huntington-White Lime Co. v. MockIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
  4. Chesbrough Lumber Co. v. Chippewa Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API