Legal Opinion
L. E. Waterman Co. v. Lockwood
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts
Decided February 8, 1904No. Nos. 951, 1,223, 1,224PublishedCited by 3 opinions
In Equity.
1Opinion of the Court
HOW FEE, District Judge.
The complainant disputes items i, 12, 14, 16, and 17 of the clerk’s taxation of costs. Objections made to items 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9”, and 10 were not pressed in argument, and are taken as withdrawn.
Item 1. Travel and attendance. The taxation is sustained upon the authority of Nichols v. Brunswick, 3 Cliff. 88, Fed. Cas. No. 10,239.
Item 12. Attorney’s fee for depositions taken. Each case involved the same question of law and fact, and depended upon the same evidence. The plaintiff was the same in all three cases; the defendants in 951 and 1,223 were different. In 1,224…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wooster v. HandyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1885
- United States v. SanbornU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1886
- The VernonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1888
- Tesla Electric Co. v. ScottU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1900
- Jordan v. Agawam Woollen Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1869
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- British & South American Steam Navigation Co. v. Delaware, L. & W. R.District Court, S.D. New York · 1912
- Chesbrough Lumber Co. v. Chippewa Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
- L. E. Waterman Co. v. JohnsonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1904