Legal Opinion
Irizarry v. East Longitude Trading Co. Ltd.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided November 24, 2003No. 3:02CV7575PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CARR, District Judge.
This is a products liability action in which plaintiffs David and Yvonne Irizarry have sued defendants East Longitude Trading Co. (ELT) and Penn State Industries (PSI). This court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Pending is defendant ELT’s Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(2) motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. For the following reasons, ELT’s motion shall be granted.
BACKGROUND
This action arises out of an allegedly defective woodworking tool manufactured and/or distributed by defendant ELT. (Doc. 27, at 2). ELT is a foreign limited…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Southern MacHine Company, Inc. v. Mohasco Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Beightler v. Produkte Fur Die Medizin AGDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2009
- Symbolstix, LLC v. Smarty Ears, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2015
- Lum v. MERCEDES BENZ, USA, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2006