Legal Opinion
Beightler v. Produkte Fur Die Medizin AG
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided April 23, 2009No. Case 3:07CV1604PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JAMES G. CARR, Chief Judge.
This is a products liability case. Plaintiffs Thomas D. Beightler and his wife, Sue A. Beightler, seek damages from defendant PFM Medical [PFM] as a result of injuries Mr. Beightler allegedly suffered due to a malfunctioning catheter. Jurisdiction arises under 28 U.S.C. § 1332.
Pending is defendant PFM’s motion to dismiss for want of personal jurisdiction. [Doc. 6]. For the reasons that follow, defendant’s motion shall be granted.
Background
Produkte fur Die Medizin AG [Produkte], a German company, ships catheters, which it does not manufacture, to defendant PFM,…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Southern MacHine Company, Inc. v. Mohasco Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
- Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Robertson-Ceco Corp., United Dominion Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Conn v. ZakharovCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- Ihf Ltd. v. Myra BagDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2019
- Premier Property Sales Ltd v. Gospel Ministries International Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2021
- Richard Conn, Jr. v. Vladimir ZakharovCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012