Legal Opinion
Lum v. MERCEDES BENZ, USA, LLC
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided February 10, 2006No. 3:05CV7191PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CARR, Chief Judge.
This is a products liability case. Plaintiffs Baorong and Kend Lum seek damages for injuries Ms. Lum allegedly suffered from a defective air bag. Jurisdiction exists pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332.
Pending is defendant Bayern-Chemie, GmbH’s (“Bayern”) motion to dismiss all claims against it for lack of personal jurisdiction. For the following reasons, that motion will be granted.
Background
On June 25, 2002, while driving her 1991 Mercedes Benz 190E, Lum was involved in a head-on automobile accident. Upon collision, the car’s air bag inflated. Lum contends that while…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Southern MacHine Company, Inc. v. Mohasco Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
- Compuserve, Incorporated v. Richard S. Patterson, Individually, and Flashpoint DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Beightler v. Produkte Fur Die Medizin AGDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2009