Legal Opinion

Murray v. Cooper

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 22, 1944PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTownley, J.

This is an action brought by Arthur Murray’s Studio which formerly employed the defendant as a dancing instructor under an agreement in writing Defendant’s employment was for a stateoperiod. On January 26,1944, the employment was terminated by mutual consent. The allegations of the complaint are that the employee has, without the written consent of the employer and within twelve months after the termination of the employment, solicited business for herself relating to dancing in violation of the agreement and engaged in her own behalf and that of her brother in the city of New York in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Clark Paper & Manufacturing Co. v. StenacherNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  2. Kaumagraph Co. v. . Stampagraph Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
  3. Foster v. WhiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  4. Foster v. WhiteNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  5. Interstate Tea Co. v. Alt.New York Court of Appeals · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Purchasing Associates, Inc. v. WeitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1963
  2. Ridley v. KroutWyoming Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Service Systems Corp. v. HarrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
  4. Bates Chevrolet Corp. v. Haven Chevrolet, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
  5. National Starch Products Inc. v. Polymer Industries Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API