Legal Opinion

City of Cleveland v. Petko

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 22, 1996No. 69830PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

James M. Porter, Judge.

Defendant-appellant Norbert Petko appeals from his conviction following a bench trial in Cleveland Municipal Court for aggravated menacing (R.C. 2903.21). Defendant challenges the conviction on the grounds that the evidence was insufficient to support the elements of the offense, that the conviction was against the manifest weight of the evidence, and that the trial court erred in the admission of photographic exhibits and hearsay evidence. We find no merit and affirm.

On June 6, 1995, Joseph Paratto was in his back yard photographing a fence erected by defendant on his…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. GarnerOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. BridgemanOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  5. State v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Abbott v. Jarrett Reclamation Services, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. State v. ClarkOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. State v. Gray, 2007-Ca-64 (7-16-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Aerosol Systems, Inc. v. Wells Fargo Alarm ServicesOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Abbot v. Jarrett Reclamation Serv. Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API