Legal Opinion

Miyano Machinery USA, Inc. v. Miyanohitec Machinery, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided June 6, 2008No. 08 C 526PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

NAN R. NOLAN, United States Magistrate Judge.

Plaintiff Miyano Machinery USA, Inc. (“MMU”) is suing MiyanoHitee Machinery, Inc., Thomas (“Tom”) Miyano and Steven Miyano for trademark infringement, cybers-quatting, unfair competition, unfair trade practices, and declaratory judgment with respect to certain marks which are used with machine tools and as service marks. Defendants have counterclaimed against MMU and its parent corporation, Miyano Machinery, Inc. (“MMJ”) for declarations that the marks have been canceled and are invalid, and charging Counterdefendants…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. United States v. ZolinSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Clark v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. Donald Rehling v. The City of Chicago, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  5. Leo Logan v. Commercial Union Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. NokesDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2009
  2. Kandel v. Brother International Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2010
  3. Baxter International, Inc. v. AXA VersicherungDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2017
  4. Specht v. Google, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010
  5. Howard v. Securitas Security Services, USA Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API