Legal Opinion
Milby v. Wright
Kentucky Supreme Court
Decided September 4, 1997No. 96-SC-117-DGPublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STUMBO, Justice.
This appeal questions the Court of Appeals’ decision that held a personal injury suit was time barred by the two-year statute of limitations contained in KRS 304.39-230(6), and that neither KRS 304.39-040(2) nor KRS 413.270 provided additional time in which to file. We affirm.
Appellant, Terry Milby (“Milby”), was injured in a single-car accident on March 16, 1989. The car in question was owned either by Milby’s employer, H.D.B. Cable Communications, Inc. (“H.D.B.”), or by David Elam and/or Harold LeMaster (co-owners of H.D.B.). It was driven by his co-worker, Mark…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Goldsmith v. Allied Building Components, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1992
- Duncan v. O'NANCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1970
- In re the Estate of RougeronNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
- Gordon v. NKC Hospitals, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1994
- Crenshaw v. WeinbergKentucky Supreme Court · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Nordike v. NordikeKentucky Supreme Court · 2007
- Commonwealth v. SteadmanKentucky Supreme Court · 2013
- Seeger v. LanhamMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
- Petrey v. CainKentucky Supreme Court · 1999
- Union Underwear Co., Inc. v. BarnhartKentucky Supreme Court · 2001
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.