Legal Opinion

Union Underwear Co., Inc. v. Barnhart

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 2001No. 1999-SC-0091-DGPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSTONE, Justice.

After being dismissed from his employment, Barnhart brought suit against Union Underwear Co., Inc. (d/b/a Fruit of the Loom), in April 1995, alleging that he had been illegally discharged because of his age in violation of KRS 344.040(1). The jury found in favor of Barnhart and recommended compensatory damages in the amount of $250,000 and punitive damages in the amount of $750,000. The trial court entered judgment against Fruit of the Loom accordingly. Fruit of the Loom appealed to the Court of Appeals, which affirmed the judgment of the trial court. We granted…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Edgar v. Mite Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Arabian American Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Oscar Mayer & Co. v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. McCulloch v. Sociedad Nacional De Marineros De HondurasSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Duncan v. O'NANCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1970

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Matthew Jahnke v. Deere and Company, Richard Czarnecki, and Bernhard HaasSupreme Court of Iowa · 2018
  2. Judkins v. Saint Joseph's College of MaineDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2007
  3. Ferrer v. MedaStat USA, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  4. Sheehan v. AshDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 2017
  5. Jett v. American National Red CrossDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2014

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API