Legal Opinion

Stone v. Leatherman

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 9, 2001PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The South Carolina Election Commission upheld the denial of petitioner’s protest of the election result in her race against respondent Hugh K. Leatherman for a Senate seat. Petitioner has filed a Notice of Appeal from the order of the Election Commission with both this Court and the Senate. Respondents move to dismiss the appeal and request costs.

Article III, § 11 of the South Carolina Constitution provides that the Senate has the authority to judge the election returns and qualifications of its own members. Pursuant to S.C.Code Ann. § 7-17-250 (1976), all appeals from protests…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Spartanburg County Department of Social Services v. LittleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  2. Anderson v. Blackwell, SEC. of StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1933
  3. Scott v. ThorntonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1959

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Segars-Andrews v. Judicial Merit Selection CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  2. South Carolina Public Interest Foundation v. Judicial Merit Selection CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  3. Rainey v. HaleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API