Legal Opinion
Bair v. City of New York
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 24, 1986PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Nicholas A. Clemente, J.
The matter before the court involves four separate cases in each of which the City of New York is named as a defendant. The four cases are Bair v City of New York, Harkin v Thorson, Bacchus v City of New York and Guralnick v Gerritsen Foodtown.
The plaintiffs in each of these actions are represented by the same attorney and in each of these actions he has served an identical notice for discovery and inspection. These notices for discovery and inspection contain 15 items, with the ninth item seeking notices of claim served upon the city.
The city…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Drzewiecki v. City of BuffaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Zambelis v. NicholasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Barrett v. City of BuffaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Big Apple Pothole & Sidewalk Protection Committee, Inc. v. AmerusoNew York Supreme Court · 1981
- Ostermeier v. Victorian House, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1984
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mollahan v. Village of Port Washington NorthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Cohen v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Shatzkamer v. EskindCivil Court of the City of New York · 1988