Legal Opinion
Ostermeier v. Victorian House, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 16, 1984PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Herbert J. Miller J.
In this action for negligence and nuisance, plaintiff, Martha Ostermeier, seeks to recover damages for personal injuries allegedly caused by codefendants, Victorian House, Inc., 67-02 *47Myrtle Avenue Corporation and the City of New York. Default judgments have been entered against Victorian House, and third- and fourth-party defendant, Moorthys Realty Corporation. Codefendants 67-02 Myrtle Avenue Corporation and the City of New York each moved to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint at the close of trial, which was held on July 23, 1984 and July 24, 1984.
Plaintif…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- D'Ambrosio v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Callanan v. . GilmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Doremus v. Incorporated Village of LynbrookNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
- Blake v. City of AlbanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Brooks v. City of BinghamtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Weinreb v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Schuster v. Town of HempsteadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Bair v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1986
- Ostermeier v. Victorian House, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Shatzkamer v. EskindCivil Court of the City of New York · 1988