Legal Opinion

Big Apple Pothole & Sidewalk Protection Committee, Inc. v. Ameruso

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 1981PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Stanley S. Ostrau, J.

This is an application in the nature of mandamus to direct respondent Commissioner of Transportation of the City of New York to accept and file certain notices of defective conditions on . the streets, highways, bridges, wharfs, culverts, curves, sidewalks and crosswalks of this city.

The petitioner is a not-for-profit corporation formed to protect residents against the dangers and hazards of streets, highways and other thoroughfares that are “out of repair, unsafe, dangerous or obstructed.” The corporation was formed in response to the local law,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pfingst v. LevittAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
  2. Bradcord Associates v. Conciliation & Appeals BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Katz v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Weinreb v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. Acevedo v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  4. Schuster v. Town of HempsteadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  5. Becker v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API